<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>BioOntology.ch - Responses</title>
    <link>http://bioontology.ch:80/</link>
    <description>Interlinked bio-ontologies for knowledge-based data-driven science</description>
    <language>en</language>
    <copyright>Janna Hastings</copyright>
    <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Janna Hastings</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-02-16T13:17:46Z</dc:date>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:rights>Janna Hastings</dc:rights>
    
    <item>
      <title>Re: Challenges in ontology education and training for scientists</title>
      <link>http://bioontology.ch:80/challenges-in-ontology-education-and-training-for-scientists#comment1361020666793</link>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;I put together a general introduction (video) about the word/concept of ontology:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTsaZWzVJ4c&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hope it can be of some use to web surfers around the world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Regards&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kent&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:17:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bioontology.ch,2012-10-10:default/c/1349871540000/1361020666793</guid>
      <dc:date>2013-02-16T13:17:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ChEBI and MeSH</title>
      <link>http://bioontology.ch:80/chebi-and-mesh#comment1337680813249</link>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;The MeSH unique IDs, for example &lt;span class="st"&gt;D033221,&lt;/span&gt; look pretty stable to me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, the 'hidden ontology' of MeSH, I reckon, is that D033221 doesn't actually stand for &amp;quot;Jehovah's Witnesses&amp;quot;, it stands for &amp;quot;biomedical papers about Jehovah's Witnesses&amp;quot;. The &amp;quot;biomedical papers about...&amp;quot; bit is understood in the indexing process, which is why the definitions omit it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;MeSH&amp;nbsp;makes a bit more (though not total) sense seen from this standpoint.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 10:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bioontology.ch,2012-04-18:default/c/1334738700000/1337680813249</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-22T10:00:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ChEBI and MeSH</title>
      <link>http://bioontology.ch:80/chebi-and-mesh#comment1336067549754</link>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Hi Christopher, thanks for your comment!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm a bit confused:&amp;nbsp;in point 3 I&amp;nbsp;say that &lt;em&gt;MeSH&lt;/em&gt; doesn't have stable identifiers, not that PubChem doesn't.  Could you clarify your objection?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2012 17:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:bioontology.ch,2012-04-18:default/c/1334738700000/1336067549754</guid>
      <dc:date>2012-05-03T17:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

